Ken Killam
Fats
"If it is well thought out, discussed and written properly then it will pass,..."
I agree with that Wes.
Disregarding the socialist blah-blah, because the whole 'club' thing IS a social system. Perhaps more, or less social to some than others. Registered voter apathy is not lost in our micro-society. Better get the word out there. Start a "Beer Party".
Status quo-mongers must be shaken, if not stirred with the suggestion/implementation of a regulation change/addition. You don't have to be a race car 'driver' to know that every organization has been, or is looking down the barrel waiting for this bullet to come out. Some have already dealt with it and moved on.
Even here in the isolation of our Great Northwet, the snowball effect of this issue has been cascading down the valley, and it's interesting that it has sparked such sudden indignation amongst some of those in the ranks.
This is good, because without that controversy NOBODY pays any attention. Perhaps now there can be some stand of solidarity on the issue, where those that are ignorant of it may be edified, and with others, further encouraged to participate in the solutions for progress that an organization like the Conference requires to remain response-able to its constituency.
Stagnation smells of the morning's stale beer, and cigar smoke.
Personally, and if I were in a position to vote on the issue, I would vote 'No' too. But that is with the knowledge the that this issue is larger than my individual perspective, and these regulations must meet the needs of the many.
So ask yourselves, "Who are the 'many', and how would they know?"
I agree with that Wes.
Disregarding the socialist blah-blah, because the whole 'club' thing IS a social system. Perhaps more, or less social to some than others. Registered voter apathy is not lost in our micro-society. Better get the word out there. Start a "Beer Party".
Status quo-mongers must be shaken, if not stirred with the suggestion/implementation of a regulation change/addition. You don't have to be a race car 'driver' to know that every organization has been, or is looking down the barrel waiting for this bullet to come out. Some have already dealt with it and moved on.
Even here in the isolation of our Great Northwet, the snowball effect of this issue has been cascading down the valley, and it's interesting that it has sparked such sudden indignation amongst some of those in the ranks.
This is good, because without that controversy NOBODY pays any attention. Perhaps now there can be some stand of solidarity on the issue, where those that are ignorant of it may be edified, and with others, further encouraged to participate in the solutions for progress that an organization like the Conference requires to remain response-able to its constituency.
Stagnation smells of the morning's stale beer, and cigar smoke.
Personally, and if I were in a position to vote on the issue, I would vote 'No' too. But that is with the knowledge the that this issue is larger than my individual perspective, and these regulations must meet the needs of the many.
So ask yourselves, "Who are the 'many', and how would they know?"
Last edited: