Ken Killam
Fats
"You're in Good Hands..."
I'm there with ya, J.C.
We find, this year, that any "New" race tracks must be accepted as sanction-able by a sanctioning body that is 'recognized', before ICSCC may allow a member club to apply, through the ICSCC's insurance plan for a spot on the schedule as a sanctioned championship points event. Somehow, even after 50 years ICSCC is not considered 'recognized' as a qualified sanctioning body.
I thank the Lords of the Cosmic Jest that we are such good, friends with SCCA for Team Continental to be able to take advantage (pay for) a brand spankin' new review process for the assessment and acceptance of race facilities for sanctionability with the SCCA, otherwise ICSCC may never be able to race on a "New" track again. An excellent precident being set with that, what?
Time was a factor in all of this last Fall-la-la. And now the potential of drivers being forced to decide between the Labor Day tow up north to Mission, compared with the possibility of a double points race later in the year down south has been eliminated.
So J.C. if you do not feel that you know "Jack" about the workings of the Conference because of your lack of tenure with the organization, that's okay. Because there will be plenty of time to study up in the off-season, lest you feel "Jacked" in future, and not understand why.
When considering the power of the driver votes to make change in ICSCC, consider the average number of drivers that show up to attend the rule change meetings provided at least once a season by your respective club's Comp. Bd. Reps. There's a formula there, I'd say.
Be one more of them voices, will ya?
I'm there with ya, J.C.
We find, this year, that any "New" race tracks must be accepted as sanction-able by a sanctioning body that is 'recognized', before ICSCC may allow a member club to apply, through the ICSCC's insurance plan for a spot on the schedule as a sanctioned championship points event. Somehow, even after 50 years ICSCC is not considered 'recognized' as a qualified sanctioning body.
I thank the Lords of the Cosmic Jest that we are such good, friends with SCCA for Team Continental to be able to take advantage (pay for) a brand spankin' new review process for the assessment and acceptance of race facilities for sanctionability with the SCCA, otherwise ICSCC may never be able to race on a "New" track again. An excellent precident being set with that, what?
Time was a factor in all of this last Fall-la-la. And now the potential of drivers being forced to decide between the Labor Day tow up north to Mission, compared with the possibility of a double points race later in the year down south has been eliminated.
So J.C. if you do not feel that you know "Jack" about the workings of the Conference because of your lack of tenure with the organization, that's okay. Because there will be plenty of time to study up in the off-season, lest you feel "Jacked" in future, and not understand why.
When considering the power of the driver votes to make change in ICSCC, consider the average number of drivers that show up to attend the rule change meetings provided at least once a season by your respective club's Comp. Bd. Reps. There's a formula there, I'd say.
Be one more of them voices, will ya?
Last edited: